Ms. O`Neill asked the Tribunal to find that the full 32 weeks of mid-wage maternity leave were charged on her length of service and that the employment contract was not valid. However, the AFP enterprise agreement ruled out that the 16 seconds of their maternity leave would be charged on their length of service. Judge Robert Bromwich dismissed the case on Friday, noting that the labour agreement provided only one means and a date for the payment of maternity leave and not a separate entitlement to a benefit. She then took another paid leave until June 30, 2016 and returned to work from July 1. “I ask the AFP to do what is morally right for the women of AFP affected by this industrial regime.” In 2019, a woman should not be penalized for paying half of the maternity leave,” she said. AFPA President Angela Smith said she respected the court`s decision, but the union was firmly convinced that federal police employees should not face financial or professional disadvantages if they simply start a family. “Imagine that “half your time doesn`t count” when you choose a child and you take the half-wage option so you can spend more time with your newborn,” she said. Do you know more about this story or do you have a problem to look at by ABC Canberra? E-Mailfirstname.lastname@example.org “The AFP maternity leave scheme complies with the Maternity Leave (Commonwealth Employees) Act of 1973, the AFP 2017-2020 enterprise contract and the AFP Executive Level Enterprise Agreement 2019-2021,” he said in a statement. The AFP objected to this assertion and argued that the service time was 16 weeks, whether their maternity leave was fully paid or spread over 32 weeks at half-payment.
Ms. Smith said that about 150 members had come to the union on this issue and that this had influenced their careers, mental health and their views on the organization. “Two employees of the same rank, who are not employed on maternity leave for the same period and are on the same paid maternity leave, would be in a position other than their period of service, pursuant to a fully guaranteed agreement, outside the Maternity Leave Act,” Justice Bromwich wrote in his decision. On returning to work, Ms. O`Neill realized that she was not in a position to count this time for the status and rank she expected. The Federal Police Association of Australia (AFPA) has filed a discrimination action on behalf of Ms O`Neill in the Federal Court, under which women public servants should not be prevented from starting a family. “It`s things like this that make fun of the AFP`s agenda for cultural change. However, Ms. O`Neill`s lawyers argued that labour laws represented a clear distinction between paid and unpaid leave, and the fact that she was paid for 32 weeks of maternity leave meant that she should be considered a service. Federal agent Claire O`Neill gave birth to a son in June 2015 and chose her 16-week paid maternity leave at half the 32-week salary.